| 126 | 0 | 85 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
开挖直径为12 m级超大竖井钻机驱动装置主轴承常面临恶劣的服役环境,为探究其复杂接触的特性,研究建立了1.9 m级推力调心滚子轴承的有限元模型,在ANSYS Workbench平台开展瞬态动力学分析,系统研究轴向载荷、转速、曲率半径比和接触角对轴承接触特性的影响以及冲击载荷对轴承滚子与内圈的影响规律。结果表明:转速对轴承接触特性影响较小,轴向载荷与滚子及内外圈的最大等效应力呈近似线性关系;接触应力沿滚子母线分布呈现显著的边缘效应,最大接触应力为2 179.2 MPa。曲率半径比为1.04,接触角为48°时,接触应力分布均匀性得到显著改善,最大接触应力下降为1 720 MPa;冲击载荷脉冲宽度由40 ms减少到20 ms时,滚子速度和加速度响应增幅为3~4倍,而轴向位移主要与脉冲幅度正相关。
Abstract:This study investigated the contact characteristics of the main bearing in a drive unit of a 12 m-class super-large vertical shaft drilling rig under harsh operating conditions. A finite element model of a 1. 9 m-class thrust self-aligning roller bearing was developed, and transient dynamic analysis was performed on the ANSYS Workbench platform. The effects of axial load, rotational speed, curvature radius ratio, and contact angle on the bearing contact characteristics, as well as the influence of shock loads on the rollers and inner ring, were systematically examined. The results show that rotational speed has little influence on the contact characteristics of the bearing, whereas the axial load is approximately linearly correlated with the maximum equivalent stress on the rollers, inner ring, and outer ring. The contact stress along the roller generatrix exhibits a significant edge effect, with a maximum contact stress of 2 179. 2 MPa. When the curvature radius ratio is 1. 04 and the contact angle is 48°, the uniformity of the contact stress distribution improves significantly, and the maximum contact stress decreases to 1 720 MPa. When the shock load pulse width is reduced from 40 ms to 20 ms, the velocity and acceleration responses of the rollers increase by 3 ~ 4 times, while the axial displacement is primarily positively correlated with the pulse amplitude.
[1] 赵一超,宋朝阳,何琪,等.厚基岩地层竖井钻机钻井法钻进技术参数及其速度分析[J].建井技术,2023,44(5):68-75.
[2] 谭杰,刘志强,宋朝阳,等.我国矿山竖井凿井技术现状与发展趋势[J].金属矿山,2021(5):13-24.
[3] 刘志强,宋朝阳,程守业,等.千米级竖井全断面科学钻进装备与关键技术分析[J].煤炭学报,2020,45(11):3645-3656.
[4] 陈全征,程永龙,吴元科,等.盾构机主轴承接触性能有限元计算研究[J].机械设计,2024,41(12):139-144.
[5] 刘奇,卢振,霍军周,等.考虑磨损的全断面硬岩掘进机主轴承寿命计算[J].轴承,2024(3):21-27.
[6] 高文香.风电轴承失效机理分析及有限元模拟[D].大连:大连海事大学,2020.
[7] 李金成,李云峰,仲志丹.联合载荷作用下三排滚子风电主轴承的摩擦力矩分析[J].太阳能学报,2024,45(10):597-606.
[8] 孙拓,王锌.变桨轴承接触应力的有限元分析[J].煤矿机械,2022,43(1):83-85.
[9] PU??CA??U A M,LUPESCU O,B??D??NAC A.Study regarding the structural response of standard cylindrical roller bearings using ANSYS and MESYS[C].MATEC Web of Conferences.EDP Sciences,2018,178:05012.
[10] 封少波,吴长江,袁麟,等.盾构机主轴承套圈表面淬火工艺[J].轴承,2024(11):121-127.
[11] 阜汉林,陈金华,蒋港辉,等.滚动接触疲劳下GCr15轴承钢WEB的形成机理[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2025,38(3):1-8.
[12] 宋云博,孟春玲,王瑞杰,等.风力发电机组变桨轴承建模方法的研究[J].机械研究与应用,2022,35(5):13-15,19.
[13] 李杨,司东宏,余永健,等.可变角度径向加载下的轴肩轴承有限元分析[J].机床与液压,2021,49(6):124-128.
[14] 张莹,肖彬,周胜飞,等.发动机主轴承盖强度分析及疲劳校核[J].轻工科技,2024,40(5):73-76.
[15] 宣立特,梁士虎,孙兀舒,等.盾构机主轴齿轮组优化设计与分析[J].机械设计与制造工程,2025,54(4):1-5.
[16] 罗良传,郭伟科,张华伟,等.高速电主轴轴承接触特性仿真研究[J].机电工程技术,2024,53(8):215-219.
[17] XIU S C,GAO S Q,SUN Z L.Analysis of thermal properties of super-high speed hybrid journal bearing based on ANSYS[J].Advanced materials research,2010,118:753-757.
[18] ??ULKA P,SAPIETOV?? A,DEKYS V,et al.Static structural analysis of rolling ball bearing[C]//MATEC Web of Conferences.EDP Sciences,2018,244:01023.
[19] TIAN F R,REN D Z,HU G L.Control of contact angle of self-aligning roller bearings [J].Mechanical manufacturing,2003,41(10):47.
[20] 王健,孟晓宁,巫海生.盾构机主驱动全生命周期维修与保养研究[J].现代制造技术与装备,2025,61(5):141-143,150.
[21] JAMALI H U,SULTAN H S,ABDULLAH O I,et al.Effect of chamfer form and parameters on the characteristics of finite length journal bearing under impact load[J].Lubricants,2023,11(2):73.
[22] 朱孝贤.基于无线电波透视法的煤矿地质探测研究[J].山东煤炭科技,2025,43(9):151-155.
基本信息:
DOI:10.15926/j.cnki.issn1672-6871.2026.01.001
中图分类号:TU67
引用信息:
[1]蔡海潮,李康宁,薛玉君,等.大型推力调心滚子轴承接触特性仿真分析[J].河南科技大学学报(自然科学版),2026,47(01):1-12+117.DOI:10.15926/j.cnki.issn1672-6871.2026.01.001.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(52031013); 2023年工信部产业基础再造和制造业高质量发展专项(2023ZY02004)